This lecture provoked a series of questions about 2.0 and the array of positives and negatives that circulate the web as we know it today. After the group had discussed the 'disclosure' we expanded on our thoughts answering themes from the principle concepts, originators of the concept, practical examples, arguments/limitations, and any further stimulated concepts. In terms of using the web for professional purposes I feel spoilt, as inspiration, castings/auditions, classes, shows/plays, all the research and information to suit my professional life style are an effortless click away. How can I therefore initially complain or question 2.0 as it enables me to access the above. I cannot comprehend how vast the web is or how many people tap into the wonders of the internet and be fed an assortment of pictures, videos and facts. Social networking sites in particularly are a massive example of how people share and communicate to one another on a regular basis. Could the popularity of facebook be perceived as a negative? Can it be harmful to its users; do the masses that log in end up being socially disadvantaged when physically engaging in public situations? Or is it a free phenomenon that enables people to correspond with loved ones that live at opposite ends of the world and a tool that we co-exist with as the world has evolved? I will leave this blog with a final thought; I believe we as humans are born with the most powerful computer that exists- the brain. Do you agree? How do you interpret this? Finally how does this interlink with 2.0, is it positive or negative? Hope this was thought provoking...
Thanks for putting a briefing about the 1st Campus Session up on your blog. Your idea about the human brain was a provocative one for the group and relates to what I was always told about photography - it is the eye behind the camera that takes the picture - not the instrument. This is of course the case - but how much does the instrument focus or distort the image?
ReplyDeleteHow do you use Web 2.0 in your daily life and do any of the theories presented int he Reader relate to this practice - or have you found other thinkers who have influenced the way you see things?